Darkest Dungeon 2

I completed the first Darkest Dungeon 4 years after starting it and just started playing the sequel Darkest Dungeon 2 a few days ago.

The developers Red Hook are very brave and ambitious to reimagine key parts of the game in DD2, because it's very different. I haven't completely wrapped my head around all of it -- completing only the first act (level of difficulty), Denial, about 6 times while failing in Resentment mid-campaign -- but I have some thoughts, all essentially stemming from the design of DD1 evolving into DD2.

DESIGN SHIFT OF BIG RUN TO MANY SMALL RUNS

My runs in the first DD were 30-50 hours long. DD2 is aiming for the established rogue-lite formula of Slay the Spire, Hades 2 and Ball x Pit where each run is about 30-60 minutes long, and you do it over and over again while making progress in metagame systems for in-run advantages. This is the source of the biggest changes in the player experience.

A SMALLER EXPERIENCE

It's a big mental transformation as DD1 felt like a big epic campaign where you had multiple teams, had to build new ones and you could manage risk mid-stage by exiting but go again later. In contrast, DD2 is heavily instanced with less continuity, unnamed Characters and a run just seems to collapse when a single Character dies in early run. It feels more fragmented and harder to put yourself into.

This isn't always the case with instanced repeat rogue-lites, because Hades 2 excels at tying the instances together through a meta layer with strong story beats and visual progression (building out the Crossroads). The meta layer is thin in DD2, with the in-run advantages being almost all of it. 

I feel the same dread and tension in DD2 battles, and the strategizing and outfitting between battles, but there isn't an overarching emotional continuity. There was a big opportunity here to build up the meta layer, because the narrator and the context of this world has always been a big part of Darkest Dungeon.

FLAVOR AND REPETITION 

There is a deep tension in the highly repetitive nature of short instanced runs and the thick dark gothic flavoring of Darkest Dungeon 2. 

By the 10th run, I was wishing I could skip the carriage sequence and the delish narrator saying stuff over and over again. This isn't to say that repetition is bad -- repetition reinforces great experiences. However, it feels like there needed to be more curation around some of these experiences.

The pre-valley experience is ponderous for what it offers, feeling like mostly a delay from beginning a new run. Separately, the inn/pre-region setup is confusing -- critical concepts like applying inn items to buff relationships and characters are poorly explained and executed in the UX, and choosing the region should come earlier in the flow and not later as they affect downstream decisions like your load out.

In all, it feels like several core segments don't hold up for something you need to play over and over again, and some of them for reasons of flavor. These would have benefitted from stronger direction for the repeated experience and more attention to detail onboarding players to concepts and systems.

COMBINATIORIAL EXPLOSIONS

The best part of rogue-lites are the insane builds you can get in a run. Slay the Spire is a great example with choices to build up skill kit and artifacts, alongside deep meaningful choices along the instance. This element is weaker in DD2 and perhaps the biggest issue for me.

DD2 does offer significant volatility in its experience when its combat can turn tides at a moment's notice like it was in DD1, but build variance is low. Skill kits are unlocked and then picked, while the Trinkets, Items and Stage Coach Items don't offer a lot to the build experience in any run. It feels like you can have great runs but they're not because of great builds. 

This is the hardest to solve. With only 20 hours in so far, I would put my money on higher build variability through the event nodes in a region, but I'll play more to understand it better.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Darkest Dungeon — forcing to play as intended

I first completed a run on Darkest Dungeon on Darkest difficulty sometime in 2020, 4 years after buying it sometime in 2016. I had attempted more than a dozen runs over the years with maybe up to 100 hours but couldn’t complete it until recently. DD is an interesting game where unless you played it as designed on an important dimension, it’s hard to actually complete a run. And the design being to treat the heroes as a commodity that you let die — just recruit more from the cart! (You can revive heroes at lower difficulty levels but at a high cost and infrequently.) This may be a slightly unfair thing to say about DD as my winning run had the lowest number of dead heroes; I just did more math in fights and played much more conservatively by exiting dungeons mid-instance when it started to look sideways. Even so a few of my starting heroes definitely went to the grave and I just had to trudge on with “the bigger plan”. It felt unnatural to an RPG player like me because in the genre perm...
Read more

Completed Slay the Spire Ascension 20, all characters

I've finished Ascension 20 for all the characters in Slay the Spire.  Between PC, Switch and iPad it took me 900 hours to do this. The durability and value you get here is one of the best qualities of a great roguelike, and I love that. That said, I'm not sure if I want to ever attempt anything like this again even though I did similar on other roguelikes like Dungeon of the Endless and FTL.  I kept playing even after I complained about how it felt like playing against random chance and it is not really about skill when you're playing at the highest levels. So the grim, absurd reality did not end up killing my desire to climb this mountain. Dice mountain. That's the power of a great game (and ego).
Read more

RNG, roguelikes and multiverse

Any one playing any roguelike at a high level knows the RNG is critical to it. For certain designs like Slay The Spire, you end runs prematurely if the dice is stacked against you early game, because you need a certain number of positive rolls early on to accumulate an advantage or profile for later on.  I've started to feel like starting a new run is like instantiating a different path in the multiverse. It's simply "another me", that "could have happened".  Delving further deeper into it, I start to feel like the RNG itself becomes everything, because if things don't fall my way I just restart into a new run. And the primary difference in that new run is RNG. And it's almost like, why does it even matter at that point, because I'm not stopping a run because of more or less skill -- though to be fair, as you play more, the depth to which you understand turns, cards, choices and meta-decision dynamics in the campaign tree continue to deepen. It d...
Read more